‘It’s not your fault you’re fucked up. It’s your fault if you stay fucked up.’
That’s a bold statement, isn’t it? As if deciding to be not fucked up is as easy a decision to make as choosing a sandwich in Tesco.
(Actually, that’s a really bad analogy. I am notoriously terrible at picking what sandwich I want for lunch).
It comes from the brilliant ‘You Are A Badass: How to Stop Doubting Your Greatness and Start Living An Awesome Life’ by Jen Sincero. Although it gets a little churchy in places, on the whole it’s a glorious celebration of seeing your own wondrousness, which isn’t as easy as it sounds, because the majority of people on this earth have been taught from an early age to revel in their own flaws. We spend years cultivating them to the point where they stop us doing much of anything at all. Which is a bit shit, no? Clever types call these Limiting Beliefs – being so convinced that you’re unable to do something that you never even try it in the first place, or start to do it but then run away crying at the first obstacle. The Badass book basically calls you out on doing this and gives you little hints and tips to start unclenching and to stop putting so much pressure on yourself to be perfect
Which is lovely.
But those perceived flaws… man alive they’re difficult demons to shift. Over the last couple of weeks an old favourite has been closer to mind than I’m necessarily comfortable with: [TRIGGER WARNING/SPOILER ALERT] my weight and how I look.
Firstly, because I have to be back in touch with my sister after years of hostile silence. A chore of a woman, she has rarely made me feel anything less than ‘resembling a wild boar’ and once sent me a diet book for my birthday. I left the house to meet her feeling vaguely well put together (see my ‘clothes are my armour post’ over on Exposing 40) but then afterwards spent 3 days trying to suppress all the bad feelings she’d raised about my appearance (‘What exactly are you trying to do with your hair?’) which led to awkward situations like crying in the supermarket over the bananas.
People can be cruel.
The second reason is because I needed to see my doctor. I’ve seen him three times since moving to the area in 2011, and each time he’s laid into me about my weight– to the point that I’ve put off seeing him this time as I don’t know that there’s been a significant enough amount of weight loss (if any) since my last visit and I just cannot be arsed with another lecture. I would perhaps be willing to listen to him if I took him vaguely seriously – he can’t say the word vagina (preferring the presumably textbook term ‘down there’) and once saw fit to point out that my breasts are different sizes, like I’d never bloody noticed – but mostly I leave his office feeling angry and ashamed, and like I can’t be trusted with my own body.
Which ties in neatly with this post from The Other Livvy, talking about weight issues from a doctor’s perspective. It’s an eloquent, bold and provocative piece, raising some useful points that are great jumping off points for wider discussion.
First of all, vocabulary. The words ‘fat’ and ‘obese’ are, I think, hugely inflammatory. Fat is one of the first insults learned in the playground and to this day it’s a word that will shut me up faster than giving me a cream bun. It’s a cheap, nasty shot designed to cause maximum embarrassment and shame. When you’re younger, You’re Fat = I don’t like you, but as an adult what I hear is ‘You’re lazy, undisciplined and a bit of a failure’. Obese is just as bad: it makes me feel like a warthog. Docs, I’m not saying you have to dress it up euphemistically (no need to roll that turd in glitter), but think about how you phrase things. Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words have been used to hurt me for a long long time and can actually do a lot of damage. Take a beat and think beyond the box you have to tick to meet your targets and think about the person in front of you. What you’re saying might not be what they’re hearing, so discuss, don’t lecture. Listen to them.
To be honest, that point goes for anyone who’s ever felt the need to give someone a talking to about their size. Unless they broach it with you first… just don’t. You’re being rude, and you come across as a bit of a bollocks.
Next: Body Positivity is not (IMO) the same as Fat Positivity. As a member of a couple of Fat Positive groups on Facebook I have to say… come on people! I saw a post the other day which was a woman complaining that umbrella manufacturers were discriminating against Fatties because her arse got wet in the rain. FOR FUCKS SAKE. To me, being Body Positive is learning to drown out the voices that tell you you’re worthless cos you have curves, and being Fat Positive is wanting shops to sell pretty clothes in bigger sizes to dress those curves in.
What Fat Positivity shouldn’t be is yelling at the top of your lungs that being a Size 26 can actually be really healthy and in any case those BMI scales are really inaccurate so go and suck it. Livvy makes some good points about the risk of illness due to weight that we should all sit up and take notice of. My dad has wildly out of control type 2 diabetes and has been hospitalized 3 times in the last 6 months. I’m not saying that that such extreme complications could’ve been avoided forever, but I’m pretty sure they’d be less severe now if only he hadn’t been such a dick about it all after his diagnosis 20 years ago and just put the cocking biscuits down. We owe it to ourselves to look after ourselves, surely. Have a slice of cake, sure, maybe just don’t have the whole damn cake. Or if you do, at least go for a walk afterwards.
Which leads me to my last point: exercise. Yes doc, I know it would help me lose weight if I got off my arse occasionally but do you know what? Some days it’s all I can do to actually get out of bed and not hide under the duvet. I’ve got money issues up the wazoo and can’t afford the gym. A wobbly size 20 and going for a run on the streets of central London, are you kidding me? SOMETIMES WE JUST CAN’T DO IT. But again this is attributed to laziness, or making excuses. Last year I told my doctor I was a bit stressed, shortly after half my face had fallen off due to a skin infection (no really, I looked like an extra from The Walking Dead. If it had been a couple of months later I’d have been sorted for Halloween). At the time, I was in the middle of a faintly traumatic break up, my dad was undergoing tests to find out exactly what those suspicious lumps on his pancreas and liver were, my neighbour was threatening to have us evicted over something stupid, I was terrified about how Brexit was going to impact my business, I was skint, and my borough council had decided it would be fun to keep trying to take us to court for unpaid Council Tax (because my flatmate had been paying it into the wrong account). So, you know, not a lot going on. I didn’t get to tell my doctor that any of this was happening because he rolled his eyes at the S word and then started banging on about how I should join a gym. And sadly it’s neither the first time that’s happened nor the first healthcare professional it’s happened with – an instant dismissal that you’re being a wimp. No one normal could possibly be stressed and eat as much cheese as you clearly do, Lardarse.
I know, I know, #NotAllDoctors. Communication is clearly key, on both sides. But it’s not always as simple as ‘Your doctor upset you? Make a complaint’, or ‘Your patient is overweight, tell them to go on a diet but do it nicely’. It’s such a loaded subject that there are no clear solutions and there will always be upset. But perhaps we could all be a bit kinder to each other: to the doctors who started their day looking at someone’s foot fungus and will have to talk about poo with at least 3 people that morning, and to the patients who maybe aren’t as clueless as Doctor Cantsayvagina might think.
As for me and my weight… well. I’ll never be a waif. But my Big Book Of Badassery tells me that I’m already pretty awesome, and anyone who says differently is a bellend (I’m paraphrasing).
Oh my word.
I’ve talked about our differences before, but Exposing 40 and I are great friends.
Even though I nearly once ruined her birthday by insisting she watch Die Hard, a film she hated with the fire of a thousand suns.
Even though I will never like one of her favourite films, Love, Actually and find it offensive on more levels than The Shard has floors.
Our friendship endures.
Films are a lifeblood to me. I’m passionate about the movies. A cinema (any cinema) is my happy place. And all because when I was 4 my parents took me to see Return of the Jedi.
The Star Wars universe basically shaped my life. That first big screen experience set me on a road that shaped my educational choices, meant I found a group of likeminded geeks at college who remain friends to this day, and am working in the entertainment industry as a business owner with a wookiee fetish.
So when, relatively soon after meeting, E40 told me that she’d a. never seen Star Wars b. had little to no interest in ever seeing it and c. really disliked sci-fi, I made it my mission to change her mind.
And it only took me 5 years.
This afternoon we sat down, I slipped Episode IV into the DVD player, and pressed play.
Shit me, I was nervous. I mean, one of my all-time favourite films and here I was about to share it with someone who in all likelihood was going to detest it. And I hope I came across as zen as I was trying to project… breath, be cool, use The Force.
What was great was that I really tried to watch it through the eyes of someone who’d never seen it before, notice details that pass you by when it’s a film you’ve seen countless times and often stick on as a visual comfort blanket when you’re sick, sad or hungover.
It got emotional.
The joy that came from explaining tiny details (‘C3PO is a dick, he has no redeeming features…. Han Solo’s a scoundrel but we love him’) and listening to her reactions (‘It’s like Lord of the Rings!’) made me really watch it again and engage with it. And bless her, never once did E40 tease me over the fact that I had tears in my eyes for a good half of it. Bloody Obi-Wan and his noble death tendencies.
As the credits rolled I looked over for the final reaction…
‘I enjoyed that! When can we watch the next one?’
Erm, OK, so despite January dragging on like an absolute bastard the 31st crept up on me quite unexpectedly.
I haven’t watched 31 new films. I’ve watched 24.
I still think that’s a pretty good achievement though – my shame at not having seen certain classics is diminishing year by year.
I’ve discovered a few gems, I’ve watched some shite, I had some thoughts that I scribbled down as well…
- Robot and Frank has an awesome soundtrack by Francis and the Lights. Seek it out immediately.
- Bananas had a surprise Sylvester Stallone! This made me so happy.
- I still haven’t seen The Great Escape. Can anyone tell me whether my life will be significantly enriched by watching it?
- It’s about time they started re-running Buck Rogers in the 25th Century. Bidi bidi.
- There’s a note about Dirty Dancing in my pad. I don’t quite know why I wrote DIRTY DANCING!! in massive capitals (I suspect I’d had wine) but I firmly believe that if you didn’t like Dirty Dancing then we can’t be friends. Sorry.
- They should make more films with puppies in them.
Till next year!!
Yes yes, Nice is a dreadful word. I’ll make an exception for Gosling though.
24. The Nice Guys (2016)
In 1970s Los Angeles, a mismatched pair of private eyes investigate a missing girl and the mysterious death of a porn star. Hilarity ensues.
Shane Black’s another clever bugger. So, yes, he wrote Lethal Weapon, and yeah, he did Iron Man 3, but he also wrote the far superior Monster Squad (including the classic line ‘Wolfman’s got NARDS!!’). I read a review that said The Nice Guys is the ‘Shane Black-iest of all Shane Black’s films’ and I know what the reviewer meant. It’s very similar to his Kiss Kiss Bang Bang that came out a few years back: buddy movie, crime caper, very clever dialogue – you’re so swept up in enjoying it all that you haven’t really got a clue what’s going on. Seriously, I watched it like a day ago and couldn’t really coherently tell you what it’s about.
Great casting though. Russell Crowe isn’t a particular favourite of mine (except for LA Confidential, he was superb in that) but he’s good in this. Gosling is, as ever, heaven (although he maybe felt a little too young for the role). 9/10 (Gets an extra mark for having Gil Gerard in it. I miss Buck Rogers more than I can say).
OK, so January is going on forever. The world has gone mad. My house is constantly full of people who talk through movies. I’m not going to make it to 31 movies.
23. City Lights (1931)
With the aid of a wealthy erratic tippler, a dewy-eyed tramp who has fallen in love with a sightless flower girl accumulates money to be able to help her medically. Hilarity ensues.
So, context. It’s late January. Everything is awful. Properly awful. I’ve just got back from a weekend up North and am already having a panic attack about work tomorrow. Time to go old school.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Chaplin movie before and I’m not sure why… I’ve seen bits of his films, and the Attenborough biopic, but nothing the whole way through.
And what a treat. Funny, poignant, like a hug from your favourite old relative who smells of lavender and pinches your cheek before giving you a Werthers. 8/10.